Search results for "High Court"

showing 8 items of 8 documents

Cuestiones varias en torno a la determinación de la filiación por doble paternidad

2018

The article 7.3 of the law 14/2006, of May 26 on technologies of human assisted reproduction establishes the possibility of determining legally the double maternity of married women and not separated legally or of fact, when the not biological mother consents that filiation decides to his favor the respect of the born son of his spouse. In the suppositions not regulated in the mentioned rule the Supreme Court in relation with equal women?s homosexuality in judgment of December 5, 2013 and January 15, 2014 applies the civil code and allows to determine judicially the maternity by means of the exercise of an action of claim for possession of status foreseen in the article 131. In the present …

2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 502169 2018 9 6653328 Cuestiones varias en torno a la determinación de la filiación por doble paternidad Berrocal Lanzarot:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]2013 and January 15Ana Isabel The article 7.3 of the law 14/2006técnicas de reproducción asistidawhen the not biological mother consents that filiation decides to his favor the respect of the born son of his spouse. In the suppositions not regulated in the mentioned rule the Supreme Court in relation with equal women?s homosexuality in judgment of December 5posesión de estadoFiliationhumanitiesUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASacción de reclamación de la filiación.technologies of human assisted reproductionpossession of statusconsent of non pregnant or biological womanconsentimiento de la madre no gestantedoble maternidad legalmaternity claim action. 276 309health care economics and organizationsof May 26 on technologies of human assisted reproduction establishes the possibility of determining legally the double maternity of married women and not separated legally or of fact2014 applies the civil code and allows to determine judicially the maternity by means of the exercise of an action of claim for possession of status foreseen in the article 131. In the present study there is going to be analyzed the mentioned regulation and the position adopted as the mentioned High Court in such resolutions. Filiacióndouble legal maternity
researchProduct

El nuevo escenario del orden público en el arbitraje : comentario a la STC de España, Sala Primera, núm. 17/2021, de 15 de febrero.

2021

The Constitutional Court delimits the concept and scope of public order, the requirement to state the grounds and the judicial review within the framework of the action for annulment of arbitral awards. The Constitutional Court rejects the jurisprudential line of the High Court of Justice of Madrid regarding the broadening of the concept of public policy and prevents the review of the merits of the case through the action for annulment.

Arbitral award:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]de 15 de febrero. Blanco Garcíagrounds for the outcome 1022 1031the requirement to state the grounds and the judicial review within the framework of the action for annulment of arbitral awards. The Constitutional Court rejects the jurisprudential line of the High Court of Justice of Madrid regarding the broadening of the concept of public policy and prevents the review of the merits of the case through the action for annulment. Laudo arbitralmotivación2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 584568 2021 32 8055247 El nuevo escenario del orden público en el arbitraje comentario a la STC de EspañaAna Isabel The Constitutional Court delimits the concept and scope of public orderSala Primeraorden públiconúm. 17/2021nulidadUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASnullitypublic order
researchProduct

Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo

2021

The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9, 2020 comes to answer the five questions that, in its preliminary question, the Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clauses, establishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16, 2017, in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement and, subsequently, those of April 11, 2018 and September 13, 2018 in the opposite direction, declaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and in…

Carolina del Carmen The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9and its economic repercussion - as well as its procedural significance. -by the consequence of the lifting of procedural suspensions that its dictation supposes2018 in the opposite direction2017consumidorin its preliminary question2018 and September 13cláusula suelothe Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clausesno doubtpacto novatorioagreed as a result of the ruling of the Luxembourg Court-. In this paper I will review the doctrine contained in the STJUE in its comparison with the one previously declared by our Supreme Courtremunerative interestMortgage:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]in attentioninterest variability 132 159consumerestablishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16new agreementsubsequentlyboth to its well-founded substantive relevance - due to the legal doctrine that it consolidates and which results from unquestionable applicationvariabilidad del interés.2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 565487 2021 31 7730055 Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo Castillo Martínezdeclaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and insistently commented resolution after its publication2020 comes to answer the five questions thatthose of April 11in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement andin order to conclude what its incidence is with respect to the criterion maintained by our High Court in its Judgments of April 11UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASfloor clauseinterés remuneratorio2018. Hipoteca
researchProduct

TRIBUNALES SUPERIORES ESPAÑOLES FRENTE A LA LIBERTAD IDEOLÓGICA. EL EJERCICIO DEL PODER EN LOS ESTADOS CONSTITUCIONALES PLURALISTAS

2021

The chapter examines some controversial decisions by the Spanish Tribunal Supremo on freedom of thought in a question related to education, in which freedom of conscience was advanced. The topics are the role of the objection of conscience in a constitutional state, the problem of the different levels of determination of constitutional principles and the room for legitimate pluralism.

High Court in Spain constitutionalism objection of conscienceSettore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Diritto
researchProduct

Financiación de asociaciones: examen especial del ejercicio de actividades económicas

2019

The economic crisis has led to an increase in the funding needs of associations and at the same time, a decrease of its resources. In view of this situation, we will examine the different existing possibilities to obtain a stable financial framework and, in light of the limitations which other systems suffer from, we will conclude that implementation of economic activities will prove to be the most practical solution. However, this exercise faces the disapproval of the Administration which considers, in many cases, that said alternative leads to the loss of its declaration of public utility and subsequently the possibility of opting for the privileged tax regime inherent in Law 49/2002 on T…

Intervention (law)IncentiveGeneral interestOrder (exchange)Political scienceWelfare economicsDeclarationPharmaceutical ScienceHigh CourtAdministration (probate law)
researchProduct

Notes on the Spanish Supreme Court Ruling That Considers Riders to Be Employees

2020

Spain is one of the countries with highest levels of judicialisation of the dispute over the classification of platform working. Dozens of rulings have been issued in recent years. Most have pointed out the labour relation of platform workers in the transport sector, although some have argued that they were truly self-employed. This contradiction in judicial doctrine has allowed / forced the Spanish Supreme Court to rule on the matter. This ruling of 25 September 2020 (rec. 4746/2019) was issued by the plenary session of the Supreme Court on social matters, the decision being adopted unanimously by all the magistrates. The ruling has its origins in the case of a delivery rider who filed an …

LawsuitOrder (exchange)Political sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectLawContradictionDoctrineHigh CourtRelation (history of concept)Economic JusticeSupreme courtmedia_commonSSRN Electronic Journal
researchProduct

Quantitative analysis of the plurality in news programs of Nou at the last stage

2016

Durante los cerca de siete meses en los que Rosa Vidal y su nuevo equipo dirigieron RTVV, se produjo un cambio de tendencia en los informativos. Unos espacios de programación —vitales para una televisión pública— que habían perdido totalmente el prestigio y la audiencia después de 24 años de historia, la mayor parte de ellos bajo el poder político del Partido Popular. Esa última época convulsa coincidió en el tiempo con la aplicación de un expediente de regulación de empleo que el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunitat Valenciana anularía, provocando la decisión de acabar con las emisiones de la televisión autonómica. También por entonces se puso en marcha el Mandato-marco y el Contr…

Layoffmedia_common.quotation_subjectPublic broadcastingPrestigeProve itCharterGeneral MedicineHigh CourtIndependencePoliticspluralidad; televisión pública; informativos; Canal 9; Nou; RTVVPolitical scienceTelevisió Noticiarisplurality; public television; news; Canal 9; Nou; RTVVHumanitiesmedia_common
researchProduct

Autonomía y pacientes reclusos

2007

The authors study a recent Spanish High Court decision declaring liability on the Administration’s part for the death of an inmate in a prison hospital. We analyse the Court’s decision using legal, ethical, medical and social perspectives. The conclusions are that: 1. the Administration has no legitimate right to force a prisoner to take medical treatment, except in circumstances in which there is a grave and definite risk to the patient’s life, or when the patient lacks capacity or when there is the risk of harm to the health of third parties; 2. That in the case of health decision making that might affect a patient, the Court has mounted a frontal attack on the autonomy of patients in pri…

medicine.medical_specialtymedia_common.quotation_subjectPrisiónLiabilityPrisonContext (language use)social sciencesGeneral MedicineCriminologyHigh CourtLegislación &ampAffect (psychology)Negativa del Paciente al TratamientoAdministration (probate law)HarmmedicineJurisprudenciaAutonomía PersonalPsychiatryPsychologyAutonomymedia_common
researchProduct